Should Social Security Benefits Be Taxed?

1. How Did We Get Here? A Brief History of Social Security Taxation

When Social Security was launched in 1935, benefits were entirely tax-free. That remained true for nearly five decades, until 1983, when legislation was passed to tax a portion of benefits for higher-income earners. This marked the introduction of the “provisional income” formula, which determines whether a retiree’s Social Security benefits are subject to federal income tax.

Set in 1984, the provisional income thresholds were $25,000 for single filers and $32,000 for married couples. However, these thresholds were never indexed for inflation. While $25,000 in 1983 is roughly equivalent to $80,000 today, the thresholds remain unchanged. The result? A growing number of retirees find themselves paying taxes on their Social Security benefits. Originally intended to affect fewer than 10% of beneficiaries, the rule now impacts nearly 50%.

2. What Does Trump Propose? No Taxes on Social Security Benefits

Former President Trump has publicly stated that Social Security benefits should not be taxed, aligning with a long-standing party platform to protect Social Security and Medicare without reducing benefits. Trump argues that taxing benefits constitutes double taxation: retirees paid into the system via payroll taxes and are now taxed again when collecting those benefits.

While this proposal sounds appealing, especially to retirees who rely on Social Security for the majority of their income, the primary beneficiaries would be middle- to high-income retirees. Most lower-income seniors are already below the provisional income thresholds and don’t pay taxes on their benefits.

3. What Happens If We Eliminate These Taxes?

Removing federal taxes on Social Security would undeniably increase take-home income for retirees. Considering that about half of all retirees depend on Social Security for at least 50% of their retirement income, this change would offer significant financial relief.

However, this move comes with a cost. In 2020 alone, roughly $100 billion was added to the Social Security Trust Fund through the taxation of benefits. Eliminating this source of revenue would accelerate the depletion of the Trust Fund, already projected to be exhausted by 2034. Without intervention, that could lead to a 20% reduction in benefits across the board. Experts estimate that ending the taxation of benefits would move up the Trust Fund depletion date by approximately one year.

And it’s not just Social Security. The Medicare Trust Fund would also face strain, with a projected six-year acceleration in its depletion timeline.

4. Can Social Security Be Saved? Possible Policy Solutions

The Social Security Trust Fund currently holds between $2.7 and $2.8 trillion. But as more baby boomers retire and birth rates remain low, fewer workers are contributing to the system relative to the number of retirees drawing from it.

Several policy changes are under consideration:

• Raising the wage cap: Currently, only income up to $176,100 is subject to Social Security payroll tax. Lifting or eliminating this cap could boost the fund.
• Increasing payroll tax rates: A small increase across all income brackets could generate billions.
• Pushing back the full retirement age: Currently set at 67 for those born in 1960 or later, raising the age could reduce long-term payout obligations.

Each option has trade-offs, but the goal is to ensure solvency without undercutting retirees’ financial security.

5. Balancing Fairness with Sustainability

Eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits could correct what many see as an unfair system of double taxation. But doing so without a plan to replace that lost revenue risks jeopardizing the long-term viability of the entire program.

Ultimately, the conversation around Social Security taxes underscores a bigger issue: the need for a sustainable, fair, and forward-thinking retirement system. Adjusting provisional income thresholds for inflation, reforming benefit structures, or gradually increasing contributions are all being discussed as ways to ensure that Social Security remains a reliable source of retirement income for generations to come.

You should always consult a financial, tax, or legal professional familiar about your unique circumstances before making any financial decisions. This material is intended for educational purposes only. Nothing in this material constitutes a solicitation for the sale or purchase of any securities. Any mentioned rates of return are historical or hypothetical in nature and are not a guarantee of future returns.

Past performance does not guarantee future performance. Future returns may be lower or higher. Investments involve risk. Investment values will fluctuate with market conditions, and security positions, when sold, may be worth less or more than their original cost.